However, there are also enough blocks on the path to growth. From the lack of legal regulation and standardization to the inability to insure military risks. And if there is an objective reason for the latter, then a number of other obstacles can and should be eliminated by the state.
A gap in the legislation. There is no definition of Military Tech in the legislation, special database and this is nonsense. Accordingly, there is no legislative regulation of the industry, there are no standards and classifiers. Instead, there are legislative restrictions on the formation of the economic component, including profit margins on the sale of goods used for military purposes.
Difficulties in licensing and obtaining permits . Manufacturers of military products have to obtain numerous permits and approvals from authorized state structures: from production to testing in the airspace of Ukraine, for example, when it comes to UAVs.
If you intend to create an explosive device,
- licenses for the production of explosive materials;
- certificates for the purchase of explosive materials;
- permits for the storage, transportation and use of explosive materials.
The process is complex and lengthy, as documents are issued by several bodies - there is no "single window". It is also necessary to take into account special technical requirements for the storage location of finished explosives, as well as the means of their transportation, which are also regulated by current legislation.
Copyright between manufacturers and businesses. If you are dealing with copyright and its registration in the Military Tech field, it is important to correctly formulate the concept of the distribution of these rights in order to avoid misunderstandings in the future on the part of each team member who.
You will have to worry about obtaining at least
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Dec 23, 2024 4:24 am