This is amazing! Moritz Leuenberger is using the M-word for the first time, which he has so far avoided as consistently as Köppel avoided the term tolerance. And he even goes a step further: he doesn't just rant about "monopoly", but also about "double monopoly". He criticises the fact that Claude Longchamp is not only the only one uae rcs data in the SRG who can make predictions before votes and elections, but that he is then allowed to comment on them exclusively, according to the dictum of the recalcitrant citizens.
Mr Leuenberger first noticed this after the minaret disaster, this situation has existed for many years. But his criticism falls a little short. Because the double Longchamp is allowed to give his performances, delivered in increasingly embarrassing outfits, on the only national television in Switzerland, it is a "triple monopoly". And, to stick with Leuenberger's diction, since the only national television and the only national radio have recently been partially switched on at the same time on voting Sundays - certain programs are broadcast at the same time - this is already a "quadruple monopoly". Perhaps the Federal Council should finally complain to the Minister of Media that in a democracy, diversity of opinion must not be undermined by such a multiple monopoly. And it should demand from him in sharp terms how such untenable conditions could have come about.