If your flight of fantasy is not limited

[sumaiyakhatun26]

There will be no sense from a map in which you entered some fictitious data. If you really expect to identify and correct all the "cracks" in the work, then you need to operate with what is happening in reality.

If you only consider the big steps . Small details are extremely important, and without them there is no point in building a map. This way you will not find your “weak spots” and will not understand what improvements need to be made.

On the contrary, you analyze everything in too much detail . If you break it down into india email list the smallest steps, the table will be too cumbersome and difficult to navigate. The map should be clear, otherwise it will be simply impossible to use. If detailing is important, then you need to write everything down separately for each scenario.

If you are creating a CJM alone . This work should be collective. The value of the map is precisely in combining efforts and moving towards the goal together. Otherwise, neighboring departments will not fully understand the essence of your proposals and improvements. The overall quality of the map as a whole will also suffer.